Skip to content

Add guidance on nested assemblies#4817

Open
jafiala wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
jafiala:fix-nested-assemblies
Open

Add guidance on nested assemblies#4817
jafiala wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
jafiala:fix-nested-assemblies

Conversation

@jafiala
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jafiala jafiala commented May 6, 2026

What changes are you introducing?

Add guidance prohibiting nested assemblies

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Nested assemblies break downstream orcharhino builds.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.18/Katello 4.20 (Satellite 6.19)
  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@jafiala jafiala requested a review from maximiliankolb May 6, 2026 07:17
@github-actions github-actions Bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels May 6, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

The PR preview for 3d3becd is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4817.surge.sh

No diff compared to the current base

show diff

@jafiala jafiala added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels May 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants