Skip to content

Refactor predefined tuning profiles into a modular assembly#4828

Draft
aneta-petrova wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
aneta-petrova:cqa-tuning-profiles
Draft

Refactor predefined tuning profiles into a modular assembly#4828
aneta-petrova wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
aneta-petrova:cqa-tuning-profiles

Conversation

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes are you introducing?

Replace the monolithic procedure with an assembly that includes two concept modules, a reference module for profile sizing, and a procedure for running the installer with --tuning.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Assisted-by: Cursor

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.18/Katello 4.20 (Satellite 6.19)
  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

Replace the monolithic procedure with an assembly that includes two
concept modules, a reference module for profile sizing, and a procedure
for running the installer with --tuning.

Point Installing Server, Installing Server Disconnected, and
Administering guides at the new assembly.

Assisted-by: Cursor
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels May 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing Not yet reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant