More adjustments to V&V.

Author: economon

_vandv/Bump_Channel.md

@@ -38,9 +38,6 @@ Structured meshes of increasing density are used to perform a grid convergence s
 4. 705x321 - 225280 quadrilaterals
 5. 1409x641 - 901120 quadrilaterals
 
-![Turb Plate Mesh](/vandv_files/Bump_Channel/images/turb_plate_mesh_bcs.png)
-Figure (1): Mesh with boundary conditions: inlet (red), outlet (blue), far-field (orange), symmetry (purple), wall (green).
-
 If you would like to run the bump-in-channel problem for yourself, you can use the files available in the [SU2 V&V repository](https://github.com/su2code/VandV/tree/master/rans/bump_in_channel_2d). Configuration files for both the SA and SST cases, as well as all grids in CGNS format, are provided. A Python script is also distributed in order to easily recreate the figures seen below from the data. *Please note that the mesh files found in the repository have been gzipped to reduce storage requirements and should be unzipped before use.*
 
 ## Results

_vandv/MMS_FVM_Navier_Stokes.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The results for solving the 2D MMS problem on a sequence of 5 grids are given be
 
 Several variations of the numerical methods are tested, namely the Roe upwind scheme with and without limiters, the JST scheme, and both the Green-Gauss and weighted least-squares approaches for computing flow variable gradients. In the figures, the abbreviations represent the following: Roe = Roe uwpind scheme with 2nd-order MUSCL reconstruction, JST = Jameson-Schmidt-Turkel centered scheme, GG = Green-Gauss gradient method, LIM = Venkatakrishnan-Wang limiter, WLS = Weighted Least-Squares gradient method.
 
-Figures containing the formal order of accuracy and the global error for both L-infinity and L2 norms are shown below. The figures with the global error also present the ideal slopes for first- and second-order accuracy. As expected for the finite volume solver in SU2, all results correctly asymptote to second-order accuracy as the mesh is refined, which verifies the accuracy of the solver for the methods investigated.
+Figures containing the formal order of accuracy and the global error for both L-infinity and L2 norms for each of the conserved variables (density, momentum, and energy) are shown below. The figures with the global error also present the ideal slopes for first- and second-order accuracy. As expected for the finite volume solver in SU2, all results correctly asymptote to second-order accuracy as the mesh is refined, which verifies the accuracy of the solver for the methods investigated.
 
 If you would like to run the MMS problems for yourself, you can use the files available in the [SU2 V&V repository](https://github.com/su2code/VandV/tree/master/mms/fvm_navierstokes). The compute_order_of_accuracy.py script drives the other files in this folder. Simply set the number of ranks on which to run the cases by modifying the 'nRank' variable at the top of the script and then execute with: