More adjustments to V&V.

Author: economon

_vandv/Bump_Channel.md

@@ -3,13 +3,14 @@ title: 2D Bump-in-Channel RANS Verification Case
 permalink: /vandv/Bump_Channel/
 ---
 
+| Solver | Version |
+| --- | --- |
+| `RANS` | 7.0.0 |
+
 <p align="center">
 <img src="/vandv_files/Bump_Channel/images/bump_cf_0p75_gridconv_sst.png" alt="Skin Friction Grid Convergence SST x = 0.75" />
 </p>
 
-| Solver | Version |
-| --- | --- |
-| `RANS` | 7.0.0 |
 
 The details of the 2D Bump-in-Channel Verification case are taken from the [NASA TMR website](https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/bump.html). 
 

_vandv/Flat_Plate.md

@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ title: 2D Zero Pressure Gradient Flat Plate RANS Verification Case
 permalink: /vandv/Flat_Plate/
 ---
 
-<p align="center">
-<img src="/vandv_files/Flat_Plate/images/flatplate_cf_0p97_gridconv_sa.png" alt="Skin Friction Grid Convergence SA" />
-</p>
-
 | Solver | Version |
 | --- | --- |
 |  `RANS` | 7.0.0 |
 
+<p align="center">
+<img src="/vandv_files/Flat_Plate/images/flatplate_cf_0p97_gridconv_sa.png" alt="Skin Friction Grid Convergence SA" />
+</p>
+
 The details of the Zero Pressure Gradient Flat Plate case are taken from the [NASA TMR website](https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/flatplate.html).
 
 By comparing the SU2 results of the flat plate case against CFL3D and FUN3D on a sequence of refined grids and seeing agreement of key quantities, we can build a high degree of confidence that the SA and SST models are implemented correctly. Therefore, the goal of this case is to verify the implementations of the SA and SST models in SU2.

_vandv/MMS_FVM_Navier_Stokes.md

@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ title: Method of Manufactured Solutions for Compressible Navier-Stokes
 permalink: /vandv/MMS_FVM_Navier_Stokes/
 ---
 
-<p align="center">
-<img src="/vandv_files/FVM_Navier_Stokes/images/accuracy_rms_rho.png" alt="Accuracy RMS Rho" />
-</p>
-
 | Solver | Version |
 | --- | --- |
 | `NAVIER_STOKES`| 7.0.0 |
 
+<p align="center">
+<img src="/vandv_files/FVM_Navier_Stokes/images/accuracy_rms_rho.png" alt="Accuracy RMS Rho" />
+</p>
+
 This page contains the results of running MMS for the compressible Navier-Stokes system in order to formally verify the order-of-accuracy for the 2nd-order finite volume solver in SU2. These cases were completed with SU2 v7.0.0.
 
 For more details, please see the presentation on the subject from the [4th Annual SU2 Developers Meeting](https://su2foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SU2_Verification_EdwinTom.pdf). 

_vandv/contribute.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: Contribute
-permalink: /tutorials/contribute/
+permalink: /vandv/Contribute/
 ---
 
 Do you want to contribute to SU2 with a V&V case study? It's easy! Just create a fork of the [SU2 Project Website repository](https://github.com/su2code/su2code.github.io), write your case study and open a pull request. 

_vandv/index.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ When available, rigorous verification via formal order of accuracy assessment by
 
 We will continue to add cases over time to demonstrate V&V of additional physical models in SU2, and we encourage contributions from the community! Please see the contribute page for instructions on how to contribute.
 
-**NOTE**: The primary purpose of this section of the website is to demonstrate V&V of the SU2 suite, and as such, the case studies are not written as tutorials. However, you can typically find the files needed to run the cases yourself in the [project V&V repository](https://github.com/su2code/vandv).
+**NOTE**: The primary purpose of this section of the website is to demonstrate V&V of the SU2 suite, and as such, the case studies are not written as tutorials. However, you can typically find the files needed to run the cases yourself in the [project V&V repository](https://github.com/su2code/vandv) or here in the [project website repository](https://github.com/su2code/su2code.github.io) .
 
 
 ## Summary of V&V case studies