Skip to content

WIP: OCPBUGS-80958: NodeUID in status to detect replaced node with same name#2821

Draft
bhperry wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
bhperry:kube-apiserver-node-replace
Draft

WIP: OCPBUGS-80958: NodeUID in status to detect replaced node with same name#2821
bhperry wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift:masterfrom
bhperry:kube-apiserver-node-replace

Conversation

@bhperry

@bhperry bhperry commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 24, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bhperry: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80958, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 24, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change adds an optional nodeUID field to NodeStatus in operator/v1/types.go. Matching nodeUID string properties are added to the status.nodeStatuses[] schema in the Etcd, kube-apiserver, kube-controller-manager, and kube-scheduler CRD manifests, with documentation describing node identity changes via UID.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so there is not enough text to assess beyond the change summary. Add a brief PR description explaining the NodeUID status change and why it is needed.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly names the NodeUID status change and its purpose of detecting replaced nodes with the same name.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed Diff only adds NodeUID API/CRD fields; no test files or Ginkgo titles were added or modified.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PASS: The PR only adds NodeUID schema/type fields in Go/YAML; no Ginkgo test files or test logic were changed, so this check is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added; the PR only updates NodeStatus/CRD schemas, so this MicroShift check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added; the PR only changes API types/CRD schemas, and operator/v1/types.go just adds NodeUID to NodeStatus.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The patch only adds optional nodeUID status fields in types/CRD schemas; no deployment, affinity, selector, or replica logic changed.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed Touched suite/setup code writes to GinkgoWriter/stderr only; the NodeUID schema change adds no process-level stdout writes.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only adds NodeUID to status type/CRDs; no new Ginkgo e2e tests or external network calls were added.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed Changed files only add NodeUID status fields/CRD schema docs; scans found no MD5/SHA1/DES/RC4/3DES/Blowfish/ECB, custom crypto, or secret comparisons.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PASS: The diff only adds nodeUID schema/type fields in CRDs and Go types; no privileged/root/securityContext settings were introduced.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The PR only adds a NodeUID status field and CRD schema/docs; no logging calls or log message changes were introduced, so no sensitive data exposure in logs.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @bhperry! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 24, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign everettraven for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bhperry

bhperry commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bhperry: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80958, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bhperry

bhperry commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhperry: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bhperry bhperry force-pushed the kube-apiserver-node-replace branch from 85d77b4 to 07f1fbe Compare April 30, 2026 17:13

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
operator/v1/types.go (1)

262-264: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Validators on currentRevision block the reset behavior documented for nodeUID changes

Lines 262 and 278 enforce that currentRevision cannot be unset once set and must only increase. However, the nodeUID field added in lines 270–274 explicitly documents that status should reset when the UID changes (indicating node replacement). These validators prevent that reset, blocking the intended functionality.

The validators must be conditioned to allow reset when nodeUID changes:

Suggested fix

Modify line 262 to allow unsetting when nodeUID changes:

-// +kubebuilder:validation:XValidation:rule="has(self.currentRevision) || !has(oldSelf.currentRevision)",message="cannot be unset once set",fieldPath=".currentRevision"
+// +kubebuilder:validation:XValidation:rule="has(self.currentRevision) || !has(oldSelf.currentRevision) || (has(self.nodeUID) && has(oldSelf.nodeUID) && self.nodeUID != oldSelf.nodeUID)",message="cannot be unset once set unless nodeUID changes",fieldPath=".currentRevision"

Modify line 278 to allow decrease when nodeUID changes:

-// +kubebuilder:validation:XValidation:rule="self >= oldSelf",message="must only increase"
+// +kubebuilder:validation:XValidation:rule="!has(self.currentRevision) || !has(oldSelf.currentRevision) || self.currentRevision >= oldSelf.currentRevision || (has(self.nodeUID) && has(oldSelf.nodeUID) && self.nodeUID != oldSelf.nodeUID)",message="must only increase unless nodeUID changes",optionalOldSelf=true,fieldPath=".currentRevision"

Also applies to: lines 270–275, 278–280

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@operator/v1/types.go` around lines 262 - 264, The XValidation rules on the
status fields currentRevision and targetRevision currently forbid
unsetting/decreasing but must allow that when the node was replaced (nodeUID
changed); update the XValidation expressions on the currentRevision and
targetRevision tags to include an OR that permits the change if self.nodeUID !=
oldSelf.nodeUID (or if oldSelf.nodeUID is missing) so the rule reads roughly
"has(self.currentRevision) || !has(oldSelf.currentRevision) || self.nodeUID !=
oldSelf.nodeUID" (and similarly allow decrease for targetRevision by adding "||
self.nodeUID != oldSelf.nodeUID"); ensure optionalOldSelf=true is present where
needed and adjust the two validation annotations referencing
currentRevision/targetRevision to include this nodeUID-change exception.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml`:
- Around line 264-269: Summary: The schema claims status should reset when
nodeUID changes, but nodeStatuses is keyed only by nodeName and
revision/validation rules enforce monotonic behavior, blocking resets on node
replacement; update the CRD so UID changes can represent a fresh status. Fix:
modify the manifest so either (A) nodeStatuses map key includes nodeUID (e.g.,
composite key or change to a map keyed by "nodeName+nodeUID") or (B) keep
nodeName key but add nodeUID as a required field inside each nodeStatuses value
and change the revision/validation rules (the fields enforcing
monotonic/non-unset revisions such as the condition revision constraints) to
only apply when the stored nodeUID equals the incoming nodeUID; ensure the
condition revision validations reference nodeUID equality (not just nodeName) or
are scoped to the value object so a UID change bypasses monotonic checks.
Reference symbols: nodeUID, nodeStatuses, and the condition/revision validation
rules that enforce monotonic/non-unset behavior.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@operator/v1/types.go`:
- Around line 262-264: The XValidation rules on the status fields
currentRevision and targetRevision currently forbid unsetting/decreasing but
must allow that when the node was replaced (nodeUID changed); update the
XValidation expressions on the currentRevision and targetRevision tags to
include an OR that permits the change if self.nodeUID != oldSelf.nodeUID (or if
oldSelf.nodeUID is missing) so the rule reads roughly "has(self.currentRevision)
|| !has(oldSelf.currentRevision) || self.nodeUID != oldSelf.nodeUID" (and
similarly allow decrease for targetRevision by adding "|| self.nodeUID !=
oldSelf.nodeUID"); ensure optionalOldSelf=true is present where needed and
adjust the two validation annotations referencing currentRevision/targetRevision
to include this nodeUID-change exception.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: d56018d4-5aa4-4450-9d29-87334e0bb187

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 589eff0 and 07f1fbe.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (17)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go is excluded by !openapi/**, !**/zz_generated*
  • openapi/openapi.json is excluded by !openapi/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-Default.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-OKD.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_25_kube-controller-manager_01_kubecontrollermanagers.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/etcds.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/etcds.operator.openshift.io/EtcdBackendQuota.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/EventTTL.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubecontrollermanagers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeschedulers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go is excluded by !**/zz_generated*
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • operator/v1/types.go
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-Default.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-OKD.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-controller-manager_01_kubecontrollermanagers.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml

@bhperry bhperry force-pushed the kube-apiserver-node-replace branch from 07f1fbe to a05c5cc Compare June 16, 2026 15:12
@bhperry

bhperry commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/testwith openshift/api/main/images openshift/library-go#2178 openshift/client-go#371

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhperry, testwith: could not generate prow job. ERROR:

could not determine ci op config from metadata: got unexpected http 404 status code from configresolver: failed to get config: could not find any config for branch main on repo openshift/api

@bhperry

bhperry commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/testwith openshift/api/master/images openshift/library-go#2178 openshift/client-go#371

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bhperry, testwith: could not generate prow job. ERROR:

BUG: test 'images' not found in injected config

@dusk125

dusk125 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/testwith ?

@dusk125

dusk125 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test ?

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dusk125: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test build
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-upgrade
/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview
/test images
/test integration
/test lint
/test minor-e2e-upgrade-minor
/test minor-images
/test okd-scos-images
/test unit
/test verify
/test verify-client-go
/test verify-crd-schema
/test verify-crdify
/test verify-deps
/test verify-feature-promotion
/test verify-hypershift-integration

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test evals-eval
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-api-master-build
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-integration
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-lint
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-minor-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-okd-scos-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-unit
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-client-go
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-crd-schema
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-crdify
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-deps
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-feature-promotion
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-hypershift-integration
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bhperry bhperry force-pushed the kube-apiserver-node-replace branch 2 times, most recently from e78b95e to 6f32214 Compare June 25, 2026 21:24

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml (1)

361-387: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Node replacement reset is still blocked by the existing currentRevision validation.

Adding nodeUID here documents that a same-name replacement node should reset its status, but nodeStatuses is still keyed by nodeName, and Lines 377-383 still reject clearing currentRevision on update. That leaves stale revision state attached to the replacement node instead of allowing a clean reset. Please update the upstream NodeStatus XValidation rules for the nodeUID transition and regenerate the CRDs/tests together. Based on the upstream NodeStatus contract in operator/v1/types.go:261-280 and the existing fixture in operator/v1/tests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml:15-90, this reset path is already enforced downstream.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml`
around lines 361 - 387, The `NodeStatus` validation still blocks a same-name
replacement node from resetting stale revision state because the existing
`currentRevision` XValidation on `NodeStatus` prevents clearing it on update.
Update the upstream `NodeStatus` contract and its XValidation rules to allow the
`nodeUID`-based replacement transition to reset status cleanly, while preserving
the intended create-time restrictions on `currentRevision` and `targetRevision`.
Regenerate the CRD and keep the downstream fixture/tests in sync, using
`NodeStatus`, `nodeUID`, and the existing `currentRevision`/`targetRevision`
validation rules as the places to update.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In
`@payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml`:
- Around line 361-387: The `NodeStatus` validation still blocks a same-name
replacement node from resetting stale revision state because the existing
`currentRevision` XValidation on `NodeStatus` prevents clearing it on update.
Update the upstream `NodeStatus` contract and its XValidation rules to allow the
`nodeUID`-based replacement transition to reset status cleanly, while preserving
the intended create-time restrictions on `currentRevision` and `targetRevision`.
Regenerate the CRD and keep the downstream fixture/tests in sync, using
`NodeStatus`, `nodeUID`, and the existing `currentRevision`/`targetRevision`
validation rules as the places to update.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: d6cb578a-f955-43c5-8027-234157e692e7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e78b95e and 6f32214.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (22)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go is excluded by !openapi/**, !**/zz_generated*
  • openapi/openapi.json is excluded by !openapi/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-Default.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-OKD.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-Default.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-OKD.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_25_kube-controller-manager_01_kubecontrollermanagers.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.crd-manifests/*
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/etcds.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/etcds.operator.openshift.io/EtcdBackendQuota.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/EventTTL.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeapiservers.operator.openshift.io/KMSEncryption.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubecontrollermanagers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/kubeschedulers.operator.openshift.io/AAA_ungated.yaml is excluded by !**/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests/**
  • operator/v1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go is excluded by !**/zz_generated*
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • operator/v1/types.go
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-Default.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-OKD.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-Default.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-OKD.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-controller-manager_01_kubecontrollermanagers.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-controller-manager_01_kubecontrollermanagers.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_25_kube-scheduler_01_kubeschedulers.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_20_kube-apiserver_01_kubeapiservers-OKD.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-OKD.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-Default.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • payload-manifests/crds/0000_12_etcd_01_etcds-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml
  • operator/v1/types.go

@bhperry bhperry force-pushed the kube-apiserver-node-replace branch from 6f32214 to e3673e7 Compare June 29, 2026 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants