Skip to content

Add support for arrangment_clip warp_markers#181

Closed
PhotonicVelocity wants to merge 8 commits intoideoforms:masterfrom
PhotonicVelocity:feat/arrangement_clips_w_warp_markers
Closed

Add support for arrangment_clip warp_markers#181
PhotonicVelocity wants to merge 8 commits intoideoforms:masterfrom
PhotonicVelocity:feat/arrangement_clips_w_warp_markers

Conversation

@PhotonicVelocity
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@PhotonicVelocity PhotonicVelocity commented Jan 29, 2026

Description

Extends the arrangement‑clip namespace (from PR-180) to include warp‑marker and warp‑mode helpers (added in PR-177 and PR-178) so arrangement clips can be inspected and edited in the same way as session clips when the warp‑marker API is available.

Adds:

  • /live/arrangement_clip/get/warp_markers
  • /live/arrangement_clip/add_warp_marker
  • /live/arrangement_clip/move_warp_marker
  • /live/arrangement_clip/remove_warp_marker
  • /live/arrangement_clip/get/available_warp_modes

Checklist

  • The title is descriptive and summarises the new changes
  • The code and any comments are consistent with the current code style
  • For any new or modified API endpoints, I have added appropriate documentation to README.md
  • For any new or modified API endpoints, I have added unit tests covering the new functionality
  • I have verified that all unit tests pass (see CONTRIBUTING.md for guidance)

@ideoforms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hi @PhotonicVelocity, thanks for all of the PRs! I'm away on an artistic residency so can't take a look at them right now, but will review them all when I'm back in a couple of weeks.

@PhotonicVelocity
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@ideoforms no worries, glad to help!

@PhotonicVelocity
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Closing to defer to PR-185.

@PhotonicVelocity PhotonicVelocity deleted the feat/arrangement_clips_w_warp_markers branch February 6, 2026 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants