enhance implementation checklist

score/component_example/docs/detailed_design/chklst_impl_inspection.rst

@@ -105,10 +105,19 @@ See also :need:`doc_concept__wp_inspections` for further information about revie
      -
      -
      -
-   * - IMPL_02_03
-     - Are detailed design and source code consistent?
-     - Check if the static and dynamic design descriptions match the code (e.g. naming of elements)
-       and that the respective traceability is established
+   * - IMPL_03_01
+     - Do the interface names in component documentation match the implemented interface names of the unit?
+     - Compare interface names used in component architecture/detailed design documentation
+       with public interfaces in source code (e.g. API headers, traits, public types/functions).
+     -
+     -
+     -
+   * - IMPL_03_02
+     - Are detailed design and source code consistent and is the respective traceability established ?
+     - Check if available static and dynamic design diagrams and the textual descriptions match the code
+       (e.g. naming of interfaces, units, functions/operations/messages, data types).
+       Check if the folder/file names of the units and its source code matches the intended functionality.
+       For example if a unit is named "communication" it should not contain code for "data processing".
      -
      -
      -