-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
chore(facade): rename predicates, add IoBuf& params, non-functional improvements #7012
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
+77
−63
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: personally, I feel like is_iobuf_full is clearer, but I guess it's matter of taste. Even if you decide to keep the new name, there is inconsistency with the local variable naming: if you decided to use reached_capacity, I would suggest to rename local variables as well:
is_iobuf_full should be renamed to reached_capacity. See both in IoLoopV2() and IoLoop().
Also, I think it would be more consistent, to update this to take a reference (base::IoBuf& buf). The rest of the file uses references for these non-optional mutable buffers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what does it mean
is_iobuf_full? what does it mean a collection (vector) is full?I am confused about the semantics of this as our collections are resizable and do not have "is_full" state. moreover, when we call
CheckIoBufCapacity, io_buf is not "full".There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, make sense, still the suggestion to rename on the 1st part is still valid.
look for (2 places):
bool is_iobuf_full = io_buf_.AppendLen() == 0;