-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
fix(CodeSigningPlugin): sign assets at processAssets ANALYSE stage before REPORT #1379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
JhohellsDL
wants to merge
2
commits into
callstack:main
Choose a base branch
from
JhohellsDL:fix/code-signing-plugin-zephyr-timing
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "@callstack/repack": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Fix CodeSigningPlugin signing assets at processAssets ANALYSE stage (2000) instead of assetEmitted, ensuring bundles are signed before plugins running at REPORT stage (5000) such as withZephyr() can capture and upload them |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this test proves assets are signed by REPORT, which is good 👍 but what about one more test for asserting the actual delta from old behavior? it might be done by checking that content at REPORT is larger than unsigned chunk or by detecting
/* RCSSB */substring in contentwdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call. I extended the test so it doesn’t only assert the JWT-shaped tail at REPORT.
There is now a processAssets tap at one stage before ANALYSE (same chunk iteration as REPORT) to snapshot the asset before CodeSigningPlugin runs. Then at REPORT we assert:
the pre-sign snapshot has no /* RCSSB / marker
the REPORT snapshot includes / RCSSB */
REPORT content is strictly longer than the pre-sign snapshot
The existing regex checks on the chunk vs main bundle are unchanged. That should document the regression we care about: anything observing assets at REPORT must see the already signed bytes, not only the final emitted file.