Feat/axone networks#850
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 17 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a ChangesNetworks Documentation Section
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| desktop | http://localhost:3000/ |
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| mobile | http://localhost:3000/ |
Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (1)
1-15:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winDeclare explicit least-privilege workflow permissions.
This workflow currently relies on default token permissions. On PR/push jobs, that’s broader than needed and increases blast radius.
Proposed hardening
name: Lint @@ on: workflow_call: @@ pull_request: branches: [main] +permissions: + contents: read + concurrency: group: lint-${{ github.ref }} cancel-in-progress: true @@ report-new-dependencies: runs-on: ubuntu-22.04 if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' + permissions: + contents: read + pull-requests: write steps: - name: Check out repository uses: actions/checkout@v6Also applies to: 29-40, 147-158
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/workflows/lint.yml around lines 1 - 15, The Lint workflow is missing explicit permissions declarations, which causes it to use overly broad default token permissions that increase security risk. Add a permissions section at the workflow level (after the on trigger definitions and before the concurrency section) to explicitly declare the least-privilege permissions needed. For a lint workflow that only needs to read repository contents, set permissions to read-only for contents access. Apply the same explicit permissions declarations to the other workflow files mentioned (also applies to lines 29-40 and 147-158) to ensure consistent least-privilege security posture across all workflows.Source: Linters/SAST tools
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/scripts/sync-external-docs.mjs:
- Around line 567-571: The generatedHeader function inserts the title parameter
directly into YAML frontmatter without quoting, which can break parsing if the
title contains special YAML characters like colons or newlines. Quote the title
variable in the template literal where it is being inserted into the frontmatter
(the line that contains title: ${title}), ensuring the title value is properly
escaped and the YAML remains valid.
In `@networks/axone-dendrite-2.md`:
- Line 101: The validator website link for cumulo.pro at line 101 uses the HTTP
protocol instead of HTTPS, which is inconsistent with the rest of the page and
security best practices. Change the href attribute in the anchor tag from
http://cumulo.pro to https://cumulo.pro, then regenerate the axone-dendrite-2.md
page to ensure the update is properly reflected.
---
Outside diff comments:
In @.github/workflows/lint.yml:
- Around line 1-15: The Lint workflow is missing explicit permissions
declarations, which causes it to use overly broad default token permissions that
increase security risk. Add a permissions section at the workflow level (after
the on trigger definitions and before the concurrency section) to explicitly
declare the least-privilege permissions needed. For a lint workflow that only
needs to read repository contents, set permissions to read-only for contents
access. Apply the same explicit permissions declarations to the other workflow
files mentioned (also applies to lines 29-40 and 147-158) to ensure consistent
least-privilege security posture across all workflows.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: df188f38-8fdc-496d-b448-650a77184adc
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.github/scripts/sync-external-docs.mjs.github/sync-external-docs-sources.json.github/workflows/auto-fix-md.yml.github/workflows/lint.ymlREADME.mddocusaurus.config.jsnetworks/axone-1.mdnetworks/axone-dendrite-2.mdnetworks/index.mdsrc/scss/_networks.scsssrc/scss/custom.scss
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/axone-networks
branch
from
d37f841 to
a761ba7
Compare
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Action performedComments resolved. Approval is disabled; enable |
2 participants
Bring some essential information about the Axone networks.
This is a first (baby) step. Improvements to come.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
axone-1) and testnet (axone-dendrite-2) networks.Documentation