fix(c++): std::unordered_map cannot be used in struct. (#3727)#3728
Open
ruoruoniao wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(c++): std::unordered_map cannot be used in struct. (#3727)#3728ruoruoniao wants to merge 1 commit into
ruoruoniao wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
ruoruoniao
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c066ec6 to
de7effa
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why?
Cannot compile when there is a std::unordered_map in struct.
What does this PR do?
Fix that .
Related issues
Issue #3727 .
AI Contribution Checklist
yes/noyes, I included a completed AI Contribution Checklist in this PR description and the requiredAI Usage Disclosure.yes, my PR description includes the requiredai_reviewsummary and screenshot evidence of the final clean AI review results from both fresh reviewers on the current PR diff or current HEAD after the latest code changes.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Benchmark