Skip to content

Move from CUDA to CUDACore#38

Merged
kshyatt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ksh/cuda_core
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

Move from CUDA to CUDACore#38
kshyatt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ksh/cuda_core

Conversation

@kshyatt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kshyatt kshyatt commented Apr 15, 2026

This should help a lot with load times (and is necessary for the corresponding TensorOperations.jl changes).

@kshyatt kshyatt requested a review from Jutho April 15, 2026 16:14
Comment thread Project.toml
version = "0.4.6"
authors = ["Lukas Devos <ldevos98@gmail.com>", "Jutho Haegeman <jutho.haegeman@ugent.be>"]
authors = ["Lukas Devos <lukas.devos@ugent.be>", "Jutho Haegeman <jutho.haegeman@ugent.be>"]
version = "0.5.0"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this count as a breaking change? I am not saying I definitely don't think it should be 0.5, but I also think that for downstream this should always be handled automatically by the CUDA compat, so should not end up breaking anyone's code

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, if I'm changing the name of a major dep, I'd always bump the minor version just as a matter of honour. But indeed compat probably protects us here... could go either way tbh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to add your name to the authors list 😄 .

I agree that it is nice to have a minor version bump for this kind of change. That it counts as breaking because we are still at 0.x is something to live with. Maybe we should consider bringing these packages to the version "1" level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would really like to add this back into Strided though, if we choose another breaking release for Strided at some point. (This is separate from this point, let's release like this for now!)

Before tagging, I also have an adapt extension locally, let me add that on top of this first

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I already tagged!!

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
ext/StridedViewsCUDACoreExt.jl 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kshyatt kshyatt merged commit 1414054 into main Apr 16, 2026
13 of 16 checks passed
@kshyatt kshyatt deleted the ksh/cuda_core branch April 16, 2026 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants