Skip to content

Definition K_eta #71

Description

@Jannekedelaat

Hi,

I was looking into the methodology of MC_Kernel, and comparing that to the equations given in Fichtner 2011. What I noticed is that kernel K_eta is slightly different defined in MC_Kernel than in Fichtner 2011:
MC_Kernel: 2*\rho ( v_{ph}^2 - v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Fichtner: \rho ( v_{ph}^2 - 2*v_{sh}^2 ) K_c
Is this a bug or is there a reason this kernel is differently defined?

Cheers,

Janneke

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions