Commit 4268590
HONEST: 4th correction — Tim Dettmers comment was general, not direct feedback to us
User asked to verify whether Tim Dettmers' HIGGS attribution comment in
llama.cpp #20969 was actually directed at quant.cpp specifically. After
re-checking the discussion timeline:
2026-04-07 21:49 @unamedkr (us) first comment in thread
2026-04-07 22:08 @Xcc313r4n7 "compares to Rotorquant?"
2026-04-07 23:56 @TimDettmers HIGGS comment — top-level,
no replyTo, no @-mention
2026-04-08 00:11 @caiovicentino (replying to TheTom)
2026-04-08 03:14 @unamedkr (us) "@TimDettmers — thank you"
Tim's comment was a top-level message to the thread (which has 6+ forks
all loosely calling their work 'TurboQuant'), NOT a direct reply to our
comment, NOT an @-mention of us. The substance applied to us along with
everyone else in the thread, and we voluntarily chose to update our
docs and reply with thanks. But Tim did not single us out, and framing
his comment as 'Tim Dettmers gave us direct feedback' overstates the
relationship.
Updated:
- README.md / README.ko.md: HIGGS reference now says 'we added this
attribution after seeing Tim Dettmers' general comment in #20969
asking participants in that thread to credit HIGGS instead. His
comment was not directed at us specifically, but the substance
applied to our naming as well, and we chose to update accordingly.'
- docs/papers/quant_cpp_arxiv_draft.md: Acknowledgements section
rewritten with the honest framing.
- bench/results/turboquant_reproduction.md: attribution update note
rewritten.
- CHANGELOG.md: v0.6.5 entry now lists this as the 4th honest
correction in the v0.6.x series and explicitly notes that the v0.6.4
commit message (commit 9481870) overstated the framing.
Saved to memory as feedback_dont_personalize_general_comments.md so
future sessions distinguish (a) direct reply / @-mention from (b) a
general top-level comment whose substance happens to apply.
The substance of the correction (HIGGS attribution) is unchanged. Only
the framing of how the feedback reached us has been corrected.
Honest corrections so far:
v0.6.0 'lossless 7×' → '+6.3% PPL'
v0.6.4 'beats fp32' → '−7% vs fp32 (NEON)'
v0.6.5 'with Metal' → 'without Metal (user default)'
v0.6.5 post 'Tim gave us feedback' → 'general comment we observed'
Each was caught by validation. Validation > marketing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent efbc023 commit 4268590
5 files changed
Lines changed: 6 additions & 5 deletions
File tree
- bench/results
- docs/papers
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
42 | 42 | | |
43 | 43 | | |
44 | 44 | | |
45 | | - | |
| 45 | + | |
46 | 46 | | |
47 | 47 | | |
48 | 48 | | |
49 | 49 | | |
| 50 | + | |
50 | 51 | | |
51 | 52 | | |
52 | 53 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
483 | 483 | | |
484 | 484 | | |
485 | 485 | | |
486 | | - | |
| 486 | + | |
487 | 487 | | |
488 | 488 | | |
489 | 489 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
508 | 508 | | |
509 | 509 | | |
510 | 510 | | |
511 | | - | |
| 511 | + | |
512 | 512 | | |
513 | 513 | | |
514 | 514 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
2 | 2 | | |
3 | | - | |
| 3 | + | |
4 | 4 | | |
5 | 5 | | |
6 | 6 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
265 | 265 | | |
266 | 266 | | |
267 | 267 | | |
268 | | - | |
| 268 | + | |
269 | 269 | | |
270 | 270 | | |
271 | 271 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments