Initial check in of issue and PR templates

Author: Jascha Franklin-Hodge

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+name: Bug report
+about: Create a report to help us improve
+title: ''
+labels: ''
+assignees: ''
+
+---
+
+**Describe the bug**
+A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
+
+**To Reproduce**
+Steps to reproduce the behavior:
+
+**Expected behavior**
+A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
+
+**Additional context**
+Add any other context about the problem here.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request---proposal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+name: Feature request / proposal
+about: Suggest an idea for this project
+title: ''
+labels: ''
+assignees: ''
+
+---
+
+**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
+A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
+
+**Describe the solution you'd like**
+A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
+
+**Is this a breaking change**
+A breaking change would require consumers of the API to modify their code for it to continue to function (ex: renaming of a required field or the change in data type of an existing field). A non-breaking change would allow existing code to continue to function (ex: addition of an optional field or the creation of a new optional endpoint). 
+
+[  ] Yes, breaking
+[  ] No, not breaking
+[  ] I'm not sure
+
+**`Provider` or `agency`**
+For which API is this feature being requested:
+[  ] `provider`
+[  ] `agency`
+[  ] both
+
+**Describe alternatives you've considered**
+A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
+
+**Additional context**
+Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

.github/pull_request_template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+**Explain pull request**
+Please provide a clear and concise reason for this pull request and the impact of the change
+
+**Is this a breaking change**
+A breaking change would require consumers of the API to modify their code for it to continue to function (ex: renaming of a required field or the change in data type of an existing field). A non-breaking change would allow existing code to continue to function (ex: addition of an optional field or the creation of a new optional endpoint). 
+
+[  ] Yes, breaking
+[  ] No, not breaking
+[  ] I'm not sure
+
+**`Provider` or `agency`**
+Which API(s) will this pull request impact:
+[  ] `provider`
+[  ] `agency`
+[  ] both
+
+**Additional context**
+Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.