Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (85 loc) · 5.76 KB

File metadata and controls

126 lines (85 loc) · 5.76 KB

DataMetaMap Project Plan

Project Goal

DataMetaMap aims to compare datasets within a unified vector space to identify semantic similarities. The core idea is that if a model performs well on one dataset, it will likely perform well on semantically similar datasets nearby in embedding space.


Development Phases & Tasks

Phase 1: Research and Preparation

  • Literature Review
    Study existing methods for dataset embedding, similarity measurement, and transferability estimation to identify best practices.

  • Data Collection
    Gather a diverse collection of datasets for experimentation, ensuring they represent various domains and formats.

  • Planning and Specifications
    Define technical specifications and success criteria based on research findings and data availability.


Phase 2: Implementation and Testing

  • Core Algorithm Development
    Implement algorithms to embed datasets into a shared vector space and compute similarity metrics between them.

  • Testing and Quality Assurance
    Develop unit and integration tests to validate correctness, reliability, and performance of the implemented methods.

  • Benchmarking and Visualization
    Run benchmarks on collected datasets and produce visual outputs such as similarity matrices to analyze and interpret results.


Phase 3: Documentation and Dissemination

  • Technical Report
    Document the methodology, experimental setup, and findings in a comprehensive technical report.

  • User and Developer Documentation
    Create detailed documentation for users and contributors, including setup guides and API references.

  • Demo Examples and Blog Post
    Prepare example notebooks or scripts demonstrating real-world use cases, and write an explanatory blog post highlighting project value and insights.

Remastered

Phase 1: Research and Preparation

  • Literature Review
    Study existing methods for dataset embedding, similarity measurement, and transferability estimation to identify best practices.

  • Baseline Selection
    Identify and select baseline methods from literature for comparison during benchmarking.

    Description (done by Meshkov Vladislav):

    • Establish baselines for each embedding method as specified in the paper
    • Assess baselines from the literature and determine their appropriateness for our benchmarking framework
    • Conduct a literature review to identify similar papers and gather additional straightforward baselines for meaningful comparison
    • Document baseline descriptions in the benchmark specifications, along with rationale for their inclusion
  • Data Collection
    Gather a diverse collection of datasets for experimentation, ensuring they represent various domains and formats.

  • Data Preprocessing Pipeline
    Design and implement preprocessing steps to handle different dataset formats and ensure consistent input for embedding methods.

    Description (done by Minashkin Vladislav):

    • Handle diverse data types: images, text, tabular, and time series with type-specific loaders
    • Fill missing values and remove bad data points
    • Save all settings for exact reproduction
  • Evaluation Metrics Definition
    Define quantitative metrics to evaluate embedding quality and similarity measurement accuracy.

    Description (done by Stepanov Ilya):

    • Define cosine similarity, Euclidean distance and kernel-based distance as core metrics to evaluate geometric separability and structural relationships between dataset embeddings in the latent space
    • Define Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) metric as described in the original paper
    • Ensure that all embedding methods and baselines will be evaluate using all metrics so that comparison across methods is consistent and reproducible
  • Planning and Specifications
    Define technical specifications and success criteria based on research findings and data availability.


Phase 2: Implementation and Testing

  • Core Algorithm Development
    Implement algorithms to embed datasets into a shared vector space and compute similarity metrics between them.

  • Baseline Implementations
    Implement selected baseline methods from literature for comparison.

  • Testing and Quality Assurance
    Develop unit and integration tests to validate correctness, reliability, and performance of the implemented methods.

  • Performance Optimization
    Profile and optimize code for memory efficiency and computational speed, especially for large datasets.

  • Error Handling and Logging
    Implement robust error handling and logging mechanisms for debugging and monitoring.

  • Benchmarking and Visualization
    Run benchmarks on collected datasets and produce visual outputs such as similarity matrices to analyze and interpret results.


Phase 3: Documentation and Dissemination

  • Technical Report
    Document the methodology, experimental setup, and findings in a comprehensive technical report.

  • User and Developer Documentation Build documentation.

    Description (done by Papay Ivan):

    • create detailed documentation for users and contributors, including setup guides and API references
    • create github.io page where user can find documentation for all classes and their methods
    • Github.io page must have headers for functions and links to their each source code.
  • Demo Examples and Blog Post
    Prepare example notebooks or scripts demonstrating real-world use cases, and write an explanatory blog post highlighting project value and insights.

  • Benchmark Results Repository
    Publish benchmark results, precomputed embeddings, and similarity matrices in a public repository for reproducibility.

  • Future Work Roadmap
    Outline potential extensions, improvements, and research directions based on current findings.