deploy: 5d93a9e

Author: adamjonas

adopting-bitcoin/2021/2021-11-16-gloria-zhao-transaction-relay-policy/index.html

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Intro Hi everyone. Some of you were at my Bitcoin dev presentation about Miniscr
 Descriptors It is very nice having this scheduled immediately after Andrew Chow’s talk about output descriptors because there is a good transition here.</description></item><item><title>Signet Integration</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/advancing-bitcoin/2020/2020-02-06-kalle-alm-signet-integration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/advancing-bitcoin/2020/2020-02-06-kalle-alm-signet-integration/</guid><description>Slides: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6fqwhx7ugr3ppsg/Signet%20Integration%20V2.pdf
 BIP 325: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0325.mediawiki
 Signet on Bitcoin Wiki: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Signet
-Bitcoin dev mailing list: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-March/016734.html
+Bitcoin dev mailing list: https://gnusha.org/url/https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-March/016734.html
 Bitcoin Core PR 16411 (closed): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16411
 Bitcoin Core PR 18267 (open): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18267
 Intro I am going to talk about Signet. Do you guys know what Signet is? A few people know. I will explain it briefly. I have an elevator pitch, I have three actually depending on the height of the elevator. Basically Signet is testnet except all the broken parts are removed.</description></item></channel></rss>

advancing-bitcoin/2020/2020-02-06-antoine-riard-taproot-lightning/index.html

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2017 on ₿itcoin Transcripts</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/</link><description>Recent content in Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2017 on ₿itcoin Transcripts</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Merkleized Abstract Syntax Trees</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/2017-09-07-merkleized-abstract-syntax-trees/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/2017-09-07-merkleized-abstract-syntax-trees/</guid><description>https://twitter.com/kanzure/status/907075529534328832
-https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/014932.html
+https://gnusha.org/url/https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/014932.html
 I am going to talk about the scheme I posted to the mailing list yesterday which is to implement MAST (merkleized abstract syntax trees) in bitcoin in a minimally invasive way as possible. It&amp;rsquo;s broken into two major consensus features that together gives us MAST. I&amp;rsquo;ll start with the last BIP.
 This is tail-call evaluation. Can we generalize P2SH to give us more general capabilities, than just a single redeem script.</description></item><item><title>Signature Aggregation</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/2017-09-06-signature-aggregation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09/2017-09-06-signature-aggregation/</guid><description>https://twitter.com/kanzure/status/907065194463072258
 Sipa, can you sign and verify ECDSA signatures by hand? No. Over GF(43), maybe. Inverses could take a little bit to compute. Over GF(2).