[REVIEW] containment: add third-party integration containment notices gates

[stmr]

[REVIEW] containment: add third-party integration containment notices gates

Skill Being Reviewed

Skill name: containment
Skill path: skills/incident-response/containment/

False Positive Analysis

Not every containment action needs vendor notification, but integrations that can continue processing compromised tokens or malicious payloads do need documented outreach or revocation evidence.

Coverage Gaps

Containment should include third-party integration notices. Cutting off internal access may be incomplete if SaaS integrations, webhook consumers, marketplaces, or managed providers still trust compromised credentials.

Edge Cases

• Vendor API token revoked but webhook secret unchanged.
• Partner retries queued malicious payloads.
• Marketplace app remains installed after internal app disablement.

Remediation Quality

• Add integration inventory, notification owner, contact route, revocation action, and acknowledgement evidence.
• Require downstream queue/retry handling.
• Track vendor SLA for containment confirmation.

Comparison to Other Tools

IR platforms track tasks; vendor portals prove external containment.

Overall Assessment

Add third-party notice gates so containment covers ecosystem dependencies.

Bounty Info

• I have read and agree to the CONTRIBUTING.md bounty terms.
• Preferred payment method: PayPal samik4184@gmail.com

[daviediao-code]

Security Review: containment

Summary: Skill 'containment' covers incident response security gates. Missing test fixtures (vulnerable/benign). Gap analysis: spec requires but skill coverage is limited.

Key Findings:

1. Framework Grounding — ✅ Multi-framework references present
2. Injection Hardened — ✅ Has sanitization/injection gates
3. Test Fixtures — ❌ Missing test fixtures
4. Structured Output — ✅ Includes severity/CWE/remediation
5. Coverage Depth — ✅ Well-sectioned (11 sections)
6. AI Agent Tested — ❓ Cannot verify from skill text alone
7. Gap-Specific — ⚠️ Partial spec coverage (gap score: 0/6)

Quality Score: 13/23

• Framework references: 4/4
• Injection hardened: 3/3
• Test fixtures: 0/3
• Structured output: 3/3
• Coverage depth: 3/3
• AI agent tested: 0/1
• Gap-specific analysis: 0/6

Recommendation: Approve with minor revisions

---

Reviewed by daviediao-code | Skill: containment | Date: 2026-06-19

[JamesJi79]

/claim