Commit 8290bce
committed
drm/i915: Don't rely that 2 VDSC engines are always enough for pixel rate
We are currently having FIFO underruns happening for kms_dsc test case,
problem is that, we check if curreny cdclk is >= pixel rate only if
there is a single VDSC engine enabled(i.e dsc_split=false) however if
we happen to have 2 VDSC engines enabled, we just kinda rely that this
would be automatically enough.
However pixel rate can be even >= than VDSC clock(cdclk) * 2, so in that
case even with 2 VDSC engines enabled, we still need to tweak it up.
So lets compare pixel rate with cdclk * VDSC engine count and
check if it still requires bumping up.
Previously we had to bump up CDCLK many times for similar reasons.
v2: - Use new intel_dsc_get_num_vdsc_instances to determine number of VDSC
engines, instead of slice count(Ankit Nautiyal)
v3: - s/u8/int/ (Jani Nikula)
v4: - Remove slice count mentions(Ankit Nautiyal)
- Use DIV_ROUND_UP in order to make sure that resulting CDCLK would
be always >= than required, after division(Ankit Nautiyal)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230704131758.14024-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com1 parent 08a3a79 commit 8290bce
1 file changed
Lines changed: 10 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
37 | 37 | | |
38 | 38 | | |
39 | 39 | | |
| 40 | + | |
40 | 41 | | |
41 | 42 | | |
42 | 43 | | |
| |||
2607 | 2608 | | |
2608 | 2609 | | |
2609 | 2610 | | |
| 2611 | + | |
| 2612 | + | |
2610 | 2613 | | |
2611 | | - | |
2612 | | - | |
| 2614 | + | |
| 2615 | + | |
| 2616 | + | |
| 2617 | + | |
| 2618 | + | |
| 2619 | + | |
| 2620 | + | |
2613 | 2621 | | |
2614 | 2622 | | |
2615 | 2623 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments