PM: EM: Rework the depends on for CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL

Now not only CPUs can use energy efficiency models, but GPUs
can also use. On the other hand, even with only one CPU, we can also
use energy_model to align control in thermal.
So remove the dependence of SMP, and add the DEVFREQ.

Signed-off-by: Jeson Gao <jeson.gao@unisoc.com>
[Added missing SMP config option in DTPM_CPU dependency]
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250307132649.4056210-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Author: Jeson Gao

drivers/powercap/Kconfig

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ config DTPM
 
 config DTPM_CPU
 	bool "Add CPU power capping based on the energy model"
-	depends on DTPM && ENERGY_MODEL
+	depends on DTPM && ENERGY_MODEL && SMP
 	help
 	  This enables support for CPU power limitation based on
 	  energy model.

kernel/power/Kconfig

@@ -380,8 +380,7 @@ config CPU_PM
 
 config ENERGY_MODEL
 	bool "Energy Model for devices with DVFS (CPUs, GPUs, etc)"
-	depends on SMP
-	depends on CPU_FREQ
+	depends on CPU_FREQ || PM_DEVFREQ
 	help
 	  Several subsystems (thermal and/or the task scheduler for example)
 	  can leverage information about the energy consumed by devices to