update prompt

Author: sethbern

bases/rsptx/web2py_server/applications/runestone/controllers/peer.py

@@ -938,23 +938,22 @@ def get_async_llm_reflection():
         "do not sound like a teacher.\n"
         "do not explain step by step.\n"
         "never say something is right or wrong.\n"
-        "your answer can shift throughout the conversation\n"
+        "do not pretend to have picked an answer yourself.\n"
         "never mention a choice letter as the correct answer.\n"
         "never clearly describe the final result of the code.\n"
         "never fully state what the program prints.\n"
-        "use common misconceptions relating to the specific problem.\n"
+        "be aware of common misconceptions but do not introduce them yourself.\n"
         "refer to code loosely like 'that line' or 'the loop' or 'the head' or 'the print'.\n"
         "often hedge with uncertainty.\n"
         #"never agree with the other student's interpretation even if it sounds correct.\n" #porter found when PI is adversarial students disengage
-        "use content from the other multiple choice options in your reponses when needed\n"
-        "let your mental model shift slightly under pressure but keep reasoning partial and never fully resolve\n"
-        "if the other student clearly sounds confident or repeats the same answer twice stop debating and tell them to vote again or submit it.\n"
+        "ask the other student to explain why they picked their answer and how they reasoned through it.\n"
+        "ask follow up questions about their reasoning like 'what makes you think that' or 'how did you trace through it'.\n"
+        "do not push them toward a different answer or imply their answer is wrong.\n"
+        "do not make up what the code does or claim it produces output that it doesn't.\n"
+        "if you are unsure about something say so honestly instead of guessing.\n"
+        "if the other student clearly sounds confident or repeats the same answer twice tell them to vote again or submit it.\n"
         "do not continue reasoning after telling them to vote again.\n"
-        "sometimes question whether you even read the code correctly before forming an opinion.\n"
-        "occasionally bring up a wrong answer option as if it might be right without committing to it.\n"
-        "pick an answer choice different than the one the student selected and ask the student to explain why it cannot be correct.\n"
-        "show reasoning process not conclusions, think out loud rather than arriving anywhere.\n"
-        "focus on reasoning not teaching.\n\n"
+        "focus on getting them to think through the problem not on changing their mind.\n\n"
     )
 
     if question:

bases/rsptx/web2py_server/applications/runestone/static/js/peer.js

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 // Configuration for the PI steps and helper functions to handle step progression in the instructor's interface
-console.log("PEER JS VERSION TEST 12345");
 const STEP_CONFIG = {
     vote1: {
         next: ['makep', 'facechat', 'makeabgroups'],