Commit ebf0d10
committed
task_work: only grab task signal lock when needed
If JOBCTL_TASK_WORK is already set on the targeted task, then we need
not go through {lock,unlock}_task_sighand() to set it again and queue
a signal wakeup. This is safe as we're checking it _after_ adding the
new task_work with cmpxchg().
The ordering is as follows:
task_work_add() get_signal()
--------------------------------------------------------------
STORE(task->task_works, new_work); STORE(task->jobctl);
mb(); mb();
LOAD(task->jobctl); LOAD(task->task_works);
This speeds up TWA_SIGNAL handling quite a bit, which is important now
that io_uring is relying on it for all task_work deliveries.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>1 parent f254ac0 commit ebf0d10
2 files changed
Lines changed: 22 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
2541 | 2541 | | |
2542 | 2542 | | |
2543 | 2543 | | |
2544 | | - | |
| 2544 | + | |
| 2545 | + | |
| 2546 | + | |
| 2547 | + | |
| 2548 | + | |
| 2549 | + | |
| 2550 | + | |
| 2551 | + | |
| 2552 | + | |
| 2553 | + | |
| 2554 | + | |
| 2555 | + | |
| 2556 | + | |
| 2557 | + | |
| 2558 | + | |
2545 | 2559 | | |
2546 | 2560 | | |
2547 | 2561 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
42 | 42 | | |
43 | 43 | | |
44 | 44 | | |
45 | | - | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
46 | 52 | | |
47 | 53 | | |
48 | 54 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments